Tuesday, 1 March 2016




 

 

FACULTY OF COMMERCE ADMINSTRATION & LAW

DEPARTMENT OF LAW

 

COURSE OUTLINE

 

Module Title
 
LEGAL RESEARCH METHODS A
 
Module Code
 
LRRM401
 
Programme in which the module is offered
LLB DEGREE
Year of offering
 
FOURTH YEAR
 
SAQA Credits
 
12 CREDITS
 
NQF level
 
LEVEL   8
 
Name of Lecturer / Lecturers
DR D. IYER

 

                       


 

Date: ………………………….

Dear Student

Welcome to the module LRRM401. This module is only offered in the first semester of the academic year and is an elective offered to fourth year students. LRRM401 is a prerequisite for LRRM402 which is offered in the second semester. Legal Research Methods is a research module applying some of the basic principles of research that would have touched on during your Legal Skills lectures. Legal Research Methods A will aim to provide the student with a basic understanding of legal research, research methods and methodologies whilst Legal Research Methods B considers the core principles of research design and equips the student with the necessary skill and knowledge to undertake legal research tasks.  It will be aimed at introducing the law student to processes of designing, developing and implementing a research project as well as well as undertaking practical research tasks that are crucial for postgraduate studies as well as practice. 

It is imperative that students understand the fundamentals of everyday law and the various legal research methods to successfully execute their responsibilities as legal practitioners and researchers. The module will give students an understanding of the necessary research tools required in law.

So of what use will this module be to me in future? As the name ‘legal research’ suggests, this module will equip you with the fundamental skills of becoming a good lawyer and legal researcher. There is very little difference between what a practising attorney does and what a legal academic or legal advisor does.

The emphasis will be on using different methods to obtain research results, understanding the difference between legal writing and academic writing, formulating a research proposal, practising basic drafting and legal writing, researching case law, computer based research, legal ethics, critical reasoning and preparing for postgraduate studies.

There is a discussion group /tutorials for students in this course. Please use it professionally and with the intention of increasing your knowledge of the subject matter. It is your discussion board. So please use it wisely.

Assessment consists of two assessments and an exam. There will be one assignment in the first term and a class test in the second term. The best way to prepare for the exam is to ensure that each week you undertake the required lecture materials and tutorial work. From a teaching perspective, this module will afford you the chance to develop your potential through participation in class discussion and individual assessment. The teaching method will therefore be interactive rather than lecturer-focused. Active participation and in-class problem solving shall be rewarded by way of inclusion in the calculation of the semester mark. There are numerous readings that you are expected to undertake as well as library sessions that you are expected to attend. 

The guiding principle in this module is that there is no right or wrong answer but rather potential answers which are subject to further qualification.

 

In order to successfully complete this course, it is therefore assumed that students should:

·         be capable of communicating competently in written and spoken English;

·         be able to work/study independently by reading, extracting and analysing relevant information from various sources of law;

·         access resources, especially the library and electronic resources;

·         apply legal problem-solving techniques;

·         follow appropriate legal referencing conventions in written work.

From a teaching perspective, this module will afford students the chance to develop their potential through participation in class discussion and individual assessment. The teaching method will therefore be interactive rather than lecturer-focused. Students that actively participate in-class problem solving shall be considered for the annual moot court competition held in Bloemfontein.

As future lawyers/magistrates/advocates or judges, LLB students will at all times be expected to act in an accountable and ethical manner. LLB students are accordingly expected to familiarise themselves with the relevant university policies as well as the student disciplinary code of the University of Zululand and act with the necessary decorum that can be expected from a law student. The department will under no circumstances tolerate copying or plagiarism. Students are furthermore expected to attend classes on time, attend tutorial classes, and submit work timeously. In the event of a student not writing an assessment or submitting an assignment on a specific date, a student must submit a doctor’s letter or death notice which will be considered in affording the student an alternative test or form of assessment.   

Best of luck with your studies

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                                Page

 

1.    DEFINITION OF TERMS                                                                                        5

2.    MODULE PURPOSE                                                                                              6

3.    GENERIC OUTCOMES                                                                                          6

4.   SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                                                                         6

4.    TOPICS WITH SCHEDULING                                                                              7

5.    NOTIONAL HOURS                                                                                                13

6.    CONSULTATION TIMES                                                                                        13

7.    MODE OF DELIVERY                                                                                            13

8.    ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES                                                                          14

9.    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA                                                                                     18

10. PRESCRIBED READINGS AND RECOMMENDED READINGS                20

11. MATERIALS NEEDED FOR THE MODULE                                                      21

12. ANNEXURE”A”                                                                                                        22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. DEFINITION OF TERMS

COURSE OUTLINE/SCHEME OF WORK/MODULE OUTLINE: Course/Module outline/Schemes of work represent a contract between the lecturer and student stipulating the requirements for each course: its aims, learning outcomes, course requirements and assessment.

LEARNER/STUDY GUIDE: A learner/study guide helps in organising lecture notes and textbook material so that students can increase their comprehension and memory of large amounts of information. Specific outcomes on topics covered, the summary of content, as well as revision questions are included.

TUTORIAL: A tutorial is an interactive method of transferring knowledge in the learning process. A tutorial seeks to teach by example and supply the information to complete a certain task.

PRACTICAL: A practical is a lesson in which theories and procedures learned are applied to the actual making or doing of something.

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: The goal of formative assessment is develop and monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by lecturers to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning.

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark.

GENERIC OUTCOMES: These are critical cross-field outcomes that inform all teaching and learning as stipulated by SAQA Regulations. 

Each module should enable students to:

·         work effectively as individuals and with others as members of a team;

·         organise and manage themselves and their activities responsibly and effectively;

·         identify and solve problems and make decisions using critical and creative thinking;

·         collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information;

·         communicate effectively using visual, symbolic and/or language skills in various modes;

·         use science and technology effectively and critically showing responsibility towards the environment and the health of others; and

·         Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation.

SPECIFIC/MODULE OUTCOMES: Learning outcomes are statements of what students will learn in a lecture. Each lecture has its specific outcomes. The statements are focused on student learning.

 

2.         MODULE PURPOSE

Legal Research Methods aims to improve the skills of the law student in aspects of research, legal and academic writing and critical thinking.

 

Therefore the purpose of the module is:

·         to provide students with an insight into legal research methods;

·         to familiarise students with academic writing in addition to legal writing;

·         to be aware of the different constructs of knowledge;

·         to be aware of ethics in research;

·         to prepare students for entry into postgraduate studies.

 

 

 

3.         GENERIC OUTCOMES

 

It is intended that students will be able to:

·         organise and manage themselves effectively;

·         collect, understand and analyse information from various sources of law, in addition to information conveyed in the lecture room;

·         recognise problem-solving contexts involving research;

·         identify and solve problems;

·         communicate effectively, both in class and through written work;

·         develop independent research skills, including the use of technology for legal research.

 

 

4.         SPECIFIC OUTCOMES

 

It is intended that by the end of the course, students will be able to:

  • be able to explain the concept of legal research;
  • be able to explain the various legal research methods;
  • understand the link between research and legal practice;;
  • be able to describe the various steps involved in the research process;
  • understand the difference between legal and academic writing;
  • be aware of the ethical responsibilities of researchers;
  • explain the major stages in conducting reseach.

 

 

5.         TOPICS WITH SCHEDULING

 
Module
 
Scheduled
date
1

Introduction to legal research.
Learning Objectives:
  • Be able to explain the concept of legal research;
  • Be able to explain the various legal research methods;
  • Understand the link between research and legal practice;;
  • Be able to describe the various steps involved in the research process;
  • Understand the difference between legal and academic writing;
  • Be aware of the ethical responsibilities of researchers;
  • Explain the major stages in conducting reseach.
 
Text:
Chapter 1 and class notes
 Week 1
8-12 Feb 2016
2

Prescribed Case law:
Kobus Maree First Steps in Research 2010 Van Schaik Publisher.
Learning Objectives:
  • Be able to explain the importance of research;
  • Discuss the relevance of research in the legal arena;
  • Discuss the link between legal research and practice;
  • Set out the different legal research methods that can be used in practice.
 
Proposed questions:
  • What is research and discuss its relevance to law;
  • Explain the relevance of research in practice;
  • Differentiate between Legal Comparative Method, Legal Historical Method and Empirical Method.
  • Discuss three paradigms of research ;
  • Comment on the different kinds of research;
  • Class exercise – write a one page synopsis of how you would go about researching the law on same sex marriages.
  • Tutorial exercise - There are many methods for collecting and making sense of data. In your tutorial discuss the following:
  • Name some of the ways in which researchers collect data in your discipline (law).
  • Name some of the methods researchers use to analyse the data in your discipline (law).
  • In your discipline (law), is truth understood to be realist (to have an objective existence) or relativist (to be socially and historically situated)? Or is truth a particular combination of the realist and relativist in your discipline?
 
Text: Class notes and power
point
 
 Week 1 & 2
12-19 Feb 2016
3

Finding legal information
Learning Objectives:
  • Understand what is meant by primary and secondary sources of legal information;
  • Discuss the information that can be obtained from the case citation and how you would go about finding case law in the library.
  • Discuss how to find journal articles and legal books electronically and in the library;
Proposed Questions:
  • Investigate the forms of primary and secondary sources that can be used in order to finalise a legal argument.
  • How would you go about locating legal material on same sex marriages in South Africa?
  • Practical exercise – a tour to the library to locate legal information.
  • Tutorial exercise - Look at the following case citation:
           Prince v President, Cape Law Society and others
           2002(2) SA 794 CC.
           Discuss the information that can be obtained from  
           the case citation and how you would go about  
           finding the case in the library.
  • Try to find the full title of the following journals:
  • SALJ and SAJHR
  • Class discussion – choose any law journal in South Africa and discuss the stylistic requirements of that specific journal.
Text: Class notes
 Week 3 & 4
22-4 March 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4

Learning Outcome:
  • Explain whether there is a difference between legal and academic writing;
  • Language and grammatical skills – look at the components of writing;
  • Analyse how you would go about drafting a legal letter or opinion as compared to a legal article;
  • Discuss the main function of punctuation marks;
  • Discuss the three overlapping stages of academic writing;
 
Proposed Questions:
  • What does it entail to be a good academic writer?
  • Discuss four possible pre-writing tasks to improve your academic writing.
  • Writing is a process with three overlapping stages. Discuss these three stages (Prewriting, Editing and Drafting);
  • What does an academic writer look for in an academic article?
  • Practical exercise - Write down your views as to whether an attorney should represent a guilty client. Discuss when you would use concrete rather than abstract words. Consider and evaluate the presentation of your writing taking into account: spelling; margins; headings; grammar; font and size etc.
  • Class exercise - Discuss the concept of free writing. Practice the concept of free writing by writing about any legal concept that comes to your head. Attach a time frame of approximately five minutes.
 
 
Text: Notes
 Week 5
7-11 March 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assessment 1
 
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7
 
 


Learning Outcome:
  • Look at the sources of information:
              The internet;
              CD Rom data bases;
              Local Area Network
  • How do you protect your data?
Proposed Questions:
  • What is an electronic search facility and how do you access legal information online?
  • List the important Internet sites for researchers;
  • How would you backup your research?
  • Practical exercise - You will be taken on a trip to the library to familiarise yourselves with electronic databases. You will be required to write a short note on what you have learnt. 
 
Major Stages in Legal Research
 
Learning Outcome:
  • What is social research and how does the research process operate?
  • How do you identify and formulate a research problem?
  • What makes a good research question?
  • What is your understanding of literature review?
  • What is a hypothesis and how do you formulate one?
  • Discuss the significance of the research design?
  • How do you collect, analyse and interpret data?
  • How does qualitative research differ from quantitative research?
Proposed Questions:
  • Make a list of the steps involved in conducting a research project.
  • Discuss at least eight steps of successful research;
  • What makes for a good quality research design?
  • Distinguish between ontology and epistemology.
  • Why do you need a research question and what are the qualities of a good research question?
  • How does the research question differ from the hypothesis?
  • Distinguish between a descriptive, explanatory and exploratory research question.
  • Tutorial – design a research question from the picture given to you in class.
  • Give examples of good and poor research questions.
  • Class exercise - Can you improve the focus of the following question?
 
      Why is there so much violence and rape in South Africa?
 
 
Research Proposal
Learning Outcome:
  • Look at the standard components of a research proposal;
  • Provide a schematic overview of the first three steps that one should take before writing the proposal;
  • Explain what is meant by a conceptual framework;
  • Design your own research proposal.
Proposed Questions:
  • Describe in detail the different aspects of the proposal;
  • Do any of the UZ research policies govern the design of the research proposal for a UZ student?
  • Demonstrate how the different aspects of a research proposal are applied practically;
  • Practical exercise – to analyse and comment on various proposals in class.
 
 
 
Text: Class notes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapters 1 to 5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapter 3/
notes
 Week 6& 7
14-21 March 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Week 8 -10
21 – 08 April
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Week 11-12
11- 22 April
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assessment 2
8

Learning Objectives:
  • Discuss four key ethical considerations that should be taken into account when conducting research;
  • Discuss how to acknowledge, paraphrase and quote sources.
  • Discuss the responsibility of researchers to fellow researchers and the academic community.
  • What is plagiarism and how does one safeguard oneself against plagiarism?
Proposed Questions:
  • Discuss situations where engaging in research may be ethically undesirable.
  • How does one test for plagiarism?
  • How does one obtain permission for conducting research;
  • Analyse UZ’s Plagiarism policy.
 
Text: notes
Week 12 and 13
22- 05 May 2016


 
 
 


 
 
 
REVISION
 
 
 
Week 14 & Week15
9-18 May 2016
10.
Examination
 
As per the Examination Schedule

 

 

6.         NOTIONAL HOURS

LRRM401 will be lectured three times a week. Kindly refer to the official time table in this regard.

 

In addition to the national hours allocated in terms of the timetable, students are expected to spend additional learning hours that are used for the learning activities and assessment of the module such as lectures, tutorials, practicals, presentations, independent study etc. 

 

 

7.         CONSULTATION TIMES

Difficulties experienced in respect of this module or queries relating to assessments/assignments may be discussed with me during consulting hours. I can be consulted during the consulting hours as displayed on my office door, room 203, Block D 3rd Floor. In case of an emergency I may be contacted at 035-9026379. Please adhere to the consultation hours!

 

8.         MODE OF DELIVERY

 

The course is taught by Dr D. Iyer. It has been divided into specific topics which will be covered in the form of viva voce lectures. These lectures will comprise of a discussion of the law as contained in textbooks, case law and legislation.

 

Students are expected to read ahead of the next lecture so that they may participate in the lecture and solve legal problems either individually or in groups. There will also be compulsory tutorial sessions every week during the semester for revision, problem scenarios and preparation of exams and tests. There is no comprehensive hand-out for the course and as such, students will be expected to take their own notes during lectures and to supplement these notes with readings provided in the course outline. It is expected that students assume responsibility for their own learning by independent study according to the guidance provided by the detailed course outline. Feedback for assignments and tests will be given during class.

 

9.         ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that he/she is registered for the correct module prior to the date of the first assessment. Only registered students’ scripts will be marked and the mark captured.

Students will be assessed by way of formative and substantive assessments.

The formal assessments will comprise of two written assessments as well as an end-of-semester examination. The two assessments and /or any assignments will count towards 50% of the module mark. The assessments may consist of the following assessment methods:-

Problem Questions
Long, qualitative answers that test the critical thinking of students.
Short Answer Questions
Short, usually descriptive, answers of between one word to a few words. Might include diagrams with explanation
Essays/ Assignment
Written work in which students state an argument supported by evidence

 

A minimum semester mark of 40% will be a pre-requirement for being allowed to write the final examination

The final examination will count towards the other 50% of the final module mark.

A student that obtains a mark of 40-49% should be entitled to a re-assessment examination. It is the student’s responsibility to ascertain from administration whether he/she qualifies for a re-assessment examination. Students that did not write the final examination due to a death in the family or illness need to apply at administration to write an aegrotat examination. The re-assessment and aegrotat examinations will be written shortly after the conclusion of the examination period for that academic year. Students that do not write the aforesaid examination will forfeit the opportunity to re-assess the module.

All assignments must be done by using Arial as a font, 12 point font, 1.5 line spacing. Sizes of pages and margins can be communicated to the student by the lecturer. Use the university approved assignment cover page. A copy of the assignment cover sheet is annexed hereto as Annexure “A”.

STUDYING AIDS

In studying this course you should also focus upon the learning objectives specified at the commencement of each module in the study book. They form the basis for your readings and revision of each topic.

Tutorials

Tutorials are mandatory for this module. At the beginning of the semester the registered students for the module will be divided into tutorial groups. Each group will be appointed a tutor, whom will keep a register of each tutorial class. During tutorials tutorial questions will be discussed and revision will be done to assist students in understanding the module content. As indicated before, tutorial questions may also be marked and such marks may be used in calculating the semester mark. Please use tutorials professionally and with the intention of increasing your knowledge of the subject matter. Tutorials will be delivered in accordance with each tutor’s tutorial slots.

Examination techniques


The formal examination requires you to demonstrate your learning to the lecturer. If you have followed these suggestions about studying, you will be well on your way to success. Here are a few additional points to help you with your exams.

Preparing for examinations

It is a good idea to begin revising the semesters materials at least two or three weeks before the examination. That way, you have time to put in a bit of extra effort on areas you are not quite certain of. Here are some extra points to help you.

·         Revise your notes.

Go over the notes you have made for yourself during your study. Make sure that you see the relationship between the key points that you have written down, and the related details.

·         Get together.

If possible, get together with others studying the same course. Discuss each point. Quiz each other.

·         Review past examination papers.

You can use same as a trial run to get an idea of working within a strict time limit. Past examination papers may give you an idea of the kind of questions that might be asked. But dont place too much emphasis on them as lecturer can ask different styles of questions.

·         Review assignments.

Go over previous assessments / assignments. If you didnt do well, look at the lecturers comments/feedback to find out where you went wrong.

·         Get to bed in good time.

Dont stay up revising all of the night before the exam. Get a good nights sleep so that you are alert and at your best. And dont skimp on meals before the exam. Mental exertion is just as dependent on a healthy body as is physical exertion.

·         Confirm examination mode.

Come prepared with all necessary equipment.

·         Be committed.

Try to build your study plan around fixed time commitments the time that you must give to your essential daily activities such as family, eating and sleeping, recreation and leisure.

·         Be realistic

Try to be realistic in planning your study time. You will probably have to give up some of the things you do to make time for study. On the other hand, most people need recreation, and find it easier to stick to a schedule if they specifically include time for sport, leisure, or other relaxation.

·         Study every day

Study is easier if you spread the work out, rather than trying to cram it all into one or two days. Also, research has shown that you learn better and remember more if you spread out your studying.

·         Your concentration span

 Most people find that it is difficult to concentrate for long periods. If you must study for a long period of time, be sure to take a break every hour for a few minutes.

·         Your study timetable

Find out what time of day you study best. Some people are most alert early in the morning, some in the afternoon and others late at night. For example, if you are a morning person, try to schedule an hour or two of study in the early morning before you go to work, or before the rest of the family is out of bed.

·         Set realistic goals

But set goals! Before you begin a study period, decide what it is you intend to accomplish. It may be to summarise one chapter, to write two pages of an essay. And give yourself a pat on the back when you have completed your assigned task.

·         Set good habits

Get in the habit of beginning work as soon as you sit at your study table. Do not use part of your study time for other things, such as straightening your room or alphabetising your books.

·         Review your work

At the end of each study period, review the work that you have done, and if necessary modify your study plan. At the end of each week, plan your timetable for the week ahead.

·         Study Strategies

Studying refers to all that you do in order to learn something. Here are some suggestions to help you study effectively.

·         Be active

Be actively involved with the things that you are trying to learn. For example, write key points in your own words. Try to relate your study to your own experience, whether it be at home, or elsewhere.

·         Avoid compartmentalisation

Try to see the relationships among different modules in a course, and different courses in your program. The more you seek for and find connections among the things that you study, the more sense they will make and the easier they will be to remember.

·         Use memory aids: List the major points in each module of a study book or chapter of a textbook. These major points form the framework of the course. If you understand the framework, you will find it easier to remember the details. Some students write important points on cards and go through them from time to time. Others write a detailed outline and pin it up on a wall by their study table. Such visible reminders are a simple and efficient way to help you memorise basic facts.

o    Form study groups: Form a study group with other students. Ask for help or to get a fresh point of view. You will find that trying to explain something to another person is one of the very best ways to learn it yourself.

 

In your examination


·         Time planning

Just as you plan how you will use your weekly study time, so too should you plan your time in the examination. Here are some guidelines on how to use your time effectively in your examination.

·         Try to leave yourself sufficient time at the end of the examination to check over your work and make any last-minute corrections.

·         If all questions have equal weight, plan to take about the same amount of time with each one. If the questions have unequal weighting, spend more time on those questions with many marks, and less time on the ones with fewer marks.

·         In multiple choice questions, dont spend too much time on questions you cant answer easily or quickly. Go ahead and answer the others first, leaving yourself sufficient time to return to those that you are unsure of.

Hints on answering questions

·         Write legibly. Even with the best will in the world, a marker cannot give you credit if the writing cannot be read.

·         In answering essay questions, make certain that your essay is well organised and grammatically correct. It will pay dividends to spend a few minutes planning your essay before you begin writing.

·         Make sure that you answer the question asked. Underline the key words in the question, and underline the verb. This will help you to focus on the essence of the question.

 

10.       ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

 

 

Specific Outcomes
Assessment Criteria
Assessment Tasks
 
Students are expected to
develop:
 
Students must provide
evidence of competency in
the following ways:
Students may be expected
to:
1. Show an in-depth
understanding of the basic principles and concepts that underlie research.
 
 Identify, explain and
critically analyse the
different forms and methods of research
 Class discussion and questioning.
 Problem and theory questions in class work and examination.
2. Understand and
appreciate the link between research and legal practice.
 Identify and explain the importance of research in practice.
 Explain the implications and effects of applying different research methods in practice.
Prepare a legal opinion applying the various research tools.
 Class discussion and questioning.
 Problem and theory questions in class work and examination.
3. Understand the various steps involved in legal research.
 Identify the various steps in research and explain concepts such as literature review, problem statement, hypothesis, research design, conceptual framework and data collection.
 Identify the components of a research proposal.
 Explain the importance of ethics in research.
 
 Class discussion and questioning.
 Problem and theory questions in class work and examination.
4. Evaluate and analyse the concept of academic writing.
 Identify the different stages of academic writing.
 Undertake legal and academic writing tasks.
 Identify similarities and differences between legal and academic writing.
 Class discussion and questioning.
 Problem and theory questions in class work and examination.
5. Apply the knowledge gained during the course to undertake research tasks in specific areas of the law.
 Synthesise and integrate the knowledge gained in order to propose practical solutions to problems whilst showing the ability to have undertaken effective research.
 Class discussion and questioning.
 Problem and theory questions in class work and examination.

 

 

           

11.       PRESCRIBED READINGS, AND ADDITIONAL (RECOMMENED) READINGS

The following articles will assist you to further your knowledge in the subject area:-

 

·         Leshem S. and Trafford V.(2007) “Overlooking the conceptual framework” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44:1, 93-105.

·          

·         Whittemore R., Chase S.K and Mandle L. C. (2001) “Validity in Qualitative Research” Qual. Health Res. 11: 522.

·          

·         Levine S.J (2005)  “Writing and Presenting your  Thesis or Dissertation”  at http://www.LearnerAssociates.net.

 

·         Pring R. (2001) “The Virtues and Vices of an Educational Researcher Journal of Philosophy of Education 35(3) 1-16.

 

 

·         Janse van Rensburg E.(2001) “An Orientation to Research- Rhodes Environmental Educational Unit, Research Methods Shourt Courses 1-31.

·          

·         Henning E.(2004) “Finding your way in Qualitative Research, Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers 1-22.

 

·         Axelrod J. (1973) “The university teacher as artist” San Fracosco Jossey Bass.

·           

·         Bitzer E.M. and  Albertyn R.M. “Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory process”. South African Journal of Higher Education 25 (5) 2011: 874-888. 

·         Delamont, S, P. Atkinson and O. Parry. (2000) “The Doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school” London: Falmer Press.

·         Dreyer C. and van der Walt J.L. (1996) “Learning and teaching styles: Empowering diverse learners in tertiary classrooms” Koers 61(4), 469-482.

·         Dunn R., Gemake J., Jalali F. and Zenhausern R. (1990) “Cross-cultutral differences

·         in learning styles of elementary age students from four ethnic backgrounds Journal of

·         Multicultural Counseling and Development 18, 68-93.

·          

·         Fang, Z. (2003) Transforming quality in research supervision: A knowledge-management approach. Quality in Higher Education, July, 9 (20): 187–198.

·          

·         Fischer B. and Fischer L. (1979) “Styles in teaching and learning” Educational

·         Leadership 36, 245-254.

·          

·         Henkel M. (2000) “Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education” London Jessica Kingsley.

·         Robertson J. and Bond C.H. (2001) Experiences of the Relation between Teaching and Research  : What do Academics Value? Higher Education Research and Development 20(1) 5-20.

·         Wadee, A.A., Keane, M., Dietz, T & Hay, D. 2010. “Effective PhD Supervision: Mentorship and Coaching” Rozenberg Publishers: Amsterdam.

12.       MATERIALS NEEDED FOR THE MODULE

Except for the obvious stationery, this module does not require any additional materials.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

\

 

 

 

Annexure “A”

 


 

FACULTY OF --------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF--------------------------------------------------------

 

ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET

Student Name
 
 
Student Number
 
 
Module Title
 
 
 
Module Code
 
 
 
Assignment Topic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due Date
 
 
 
Name of Lecturer
 
 
Lecturer’s Remarks
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 



No comments :

Post a Comment